SQL

Consider the relation account (customer, balance) where customer is a primary key and there are no null values. We would like to rank customers according to decreasing balance. The customer with the largest balance gets rank 1. ties are not broke but ranks are skipped: if exactly two customers have the largest balance they each get rank 1 and rank 2 is not assigned.

Query1:
  select A.customer, count(B.customer)
  from account A, account B
  where A.balance <=B.balance
  group by A.customer

Query2:
  select A.customer, 1+count(B.customer)
  from account A, account B
  where A.balance < B.balance
  group by A.customer

Consider these statements about Query1 and Query2.

1. Query1 will produce the same row set as Query2 for 
   some but not all databases.
2. Both Query1 and Query2 are correct implementation 
   of the specification
3. Query1 is a correct implementation of the specification
   but Query2 is not
4. Neither Query1 nor Query2 is a correct implementation
   of the specification
5. Assigning rank with a pure relational query takes 
   less time than scanning in decreasing balance order 
   assigning ranks using ODBC.

Which two of the above statements are correct?