Recursive-and-Recursively-Enumerable-Language

Question 1

Nobody knows yet if P = NP. Consider the language L defined as follows:

Which of the following statements is true?

A
L is recursive
B
L is recursively enumerable but not recursive
C
L is not recursively enumerable
D
Whether L is recursive or not will be known after we find out if P = NP
Question 1 Explanation: 
Here, we have two possibilities, whether
P = NP (or) P != NP
→ If P=NP then L=(0+1)* which is regular, then it is recursive.
→ If P!=NP then L becomes ɸ which is also regular, then it is recursive.
So, finally L is recursive.
Question 2

L1 is a recursively enumerable language over Σ. An algorithm A effectively enumerates its words as w1, w2, w3, ... Define another language L2 over Σ Union {#} as {wi # wj : wi, wj ∈ L1, i < j}. Here # is a new symbol. Consider the following assertions.

S1: L1 is recursive implies L2 is recursive
S2: L2 is recursive implies L1 is recursive

Which of the following statements is true?

A
Both S1 and S2 are true
B
S1 is true but S2 is not necessarily true
C
S2 is true but S1 is not necessarily true
D
Neither is necessarily true
Question 2 Explanation: 
Given that
L1 = recursively enumerable language
L2 over Σ∪{#} as {wi#wj | wi, wj ∈ L1, i < j}
S1 is True.
If L1 is recursive then L2 is also recursive. Because, to check w = wi#wj belongs to L2, and we give wi and wj to the corresponding decider L1, if both are to be accepted, then w∈L1 and not otherwise.
S2 is also True:
With the corresponding decider L2 we need to make decide L1.
Question 3

Let L1 be a recursive language, and let L2 be a recursively enumerable but not a recursive language. Which one of the following is TRUE?

A
B
C
D
Question 3 Explanation: 
Recursive languages are closed under complementation.
But, recursive enumerable languages are not closed under complementation.
If L1 is recursive, then L1', is also recursive.
If L2 is recursive enumerable, then L2', is not recursive enumerable language.
Question 4

Let X be a recursive language and Y be a recursively enumerable but not recursive language. Let W and Z be two languages such that  reduces to W, and Z reduces to  (reduction means the standard many-one reduction). Which one of the following statements is TRUE?

A
W can be recursively enumerable and Z is recursive.
B
W can be recursive and Z is recursively enumerable.
C
W is not recursively enumerable and Z is recursive.
D
W is not recursively enumerable and Z is not recursive.
Question 4 Explanation: 
The rules are:
If A ≤ p B
Rule 1: If B is recursive then A is recursive
Rule 2: If B is recursively enumerable then A is recursively enumerable
Rule 3: If A is not recursively enumerable then B is not recursively enumerable
Since X is recursive and recursive language is closed under compliment, so is also recursive.
: By rule 3, W is not recursively enumerable.
: By rule 1, Z is recursive.
Hence, W is not recursively enumerable and Z is recursive.
There are 4 questions to complete.

Access quiz wise question and answers by becoming as a solutions adda PRO SUBSCRIBER with Ad-Free content

Register Now

If you have registered and made your payment please contact solutionsadda.in@gmail.com to get access